The problem asked was to settle the possibility of consistent estimation with incomplete data in three examples, and to provide a concrete one when consistent estimation is possible.
Intuitively, in case (a), you can only infer about , but not the sign of . Denote ; the distribution of each and hence the joint distribution of depends only on . Suppose is a consistent estimate (tor) of . Fix . Then, , as , which would contradict under every .
In case (b), consistent estimation of is possible. This is because the family of Poisson distributions is strictly MLR in and hence, for any , is strictly increasing in ; it is also continuous. Denote . Then, is a consistent estimate of , and by the continuous mapping theorem, is a consistent estimate of ; the estimate may be defined arbitrarily (for example, as 1), if or .
Finally in case (c), perhaps a little surprisingly, consistent estimation of the exponential mean is possible as well. By a direct calculation, the fractional part has the density . This is a regular one parameter Exponential family and therefore the natural parameter is consistently estimable, and so, is also consistently estimable. For example, a concrete consistent estimate can be constructed by estimating , necessarily a strictly increasing function of the natural parameter, by , and then by using the inverse function.
Comments on “Solution to Student Puzzle Corner 10”